What the Independent tells us about the Guardian’s crimes

4619841406_69a1a0343d_b

Julian Smith MP has filed a complaint to the Metropolitan Police about the Guardian and its potential breaches of the Terrorism Act 2000. Under the Act, it is a terrorist offence to communicate names, or any identifying material, of GCHQ personnel – not just to publish those names, but to communicate them.

The Guardian shipped GCHQ files to American bloggers and the New York Times. In so doing they did a lot more than journalism, ie receiving files and reporting on them. They became traffickers and distributors.

They have refused to answer my questions on Twitter as to whether their trafficked files included names of GCHQ staff, issuing a classic non-denial denial to the Daily Mail that reads like an admission: “We did not include the names of any British spies.” Spies? It’s a terrorist offence to communicate identifying info on any GCHQ personnel.

Well, the Guardian gets all the love and money from this betrayal of our security forces, but there’s another British paper that got to see the Snowden files. The Independent, in August, ran a story about a secret British base in the Middle East.

I believe this story was abominably irresponsible and a betrayal of national security. The excuse was the paper didn’t provide an address and a map. So what? They revealed the existence of the base and put all its operations and operatives in jeapoardy.

However, and it is a big however, the Independent here was “committing journalism” as the Guardian likes to put it when trying to avoid the police. They received the files and they reported on them. Irresponsibly and morally wrongly, but that’s all they did,

They didn’t copy the files. They didn’t traffic the files. They didn’t hand the files to foreigner papers and bloggers. They just reported on them.

Once the Telegraph and the Daily Mail – to their eternal credit – started to challenge the Guardian’s muling and commercial trading on our agents’ safety, the Independent published this little-noted editorial. But for the purposes of the police investigation, it is a crucial one, because it tells us just exactly what Guardian editors copied and gave to foreigners in order to get their dying paper more money from online clicks.

In August, we too were given information from the Snowden files. It pertained to the operation of the security services, was highly detailed, and had the capacity to compromise Britain’s security.

I think that’s pretty damned clear.

Yes, it is ludicrous that the Independent thinks publishing a front-page story revealing a secret British Middle Eastern base is not “sensitive” or “damaging”. But they are informing their readers – roughly the same base as the Guardian, the liberal left – just how awful the GCHQ Snowden files are.

Glenn Greenwald, who has now left the Guardian for a French-funded company with his fellow traitor Laura Poitras, was kind enough to tell the world on Twitter that Alan Rusbridger and Janine Gibson were concerned not to expose any NSA spying, but merely to endanger British operations. He told us what the documents they copied and muled to a blog and the NYT were on September 10th

@peterkofod As for NYT, I had no role at all in that – those were 1 set of docs only about UK that G had. They made that choice without me.

Julian Smith MP’s letter does more than ask the police to investigate if GCHQ personnel were identified in these “just about Britain” documents the Guardian trafficked to foreigners. He also asks the police to compel Alan Rusbridger and Janine Gibson to help in decryption efforts. After all, they have the documents, and they are happy to hand them to bloggers. And from the Independent, we know that the documents could not be more dangerous to the security of this nation. If a British commercial media company is sitting on the decyrption key, they have to hand it over to our intelligence forces. Instead of helping the police and GCHQ see what damage has been done, which agents’ names are out there, and assisting them in saving lives, Rusbridger has admitted online that he has actively prevented this vital information being accessed:

Are you taking any precautions to prevent US/UK government tampering/stealing with the documents?

Alan Rusbridger: Yes. And many of them are now with the NYT

Julian Smith MP has taken direct action by referring all of this to anti-terrorist police. But of course, it is a question for the Government too. The Home Office Committee is now investigating the Guardian. I have no doubt they will rightly ask ministers if they asked the Guardian for access to these terrible documents and if denied, whether and when they sought an injunction or subpoena to compel this commercial company to give the security forces access.

Once again, thanks to the Independent’s honesty in its editorial, we know the stakes for our intelligence services could not be higher.

It pertained to the operation of the security services, was highly detailed, and had the capacity to compromise Britain’s security.

I believe that anti-terror police are already actively on to breaches of the Terrorism Act 2000. But the Government, for whom defence of the realm is its first duty, must also play its part and not be cowed by the Guardian-BBC axis. We must never let fear of the press stop us from doing the right thing. The legal tools are there to compel the Guardian to share access to these files not just with commercial papers and bloggers but with the forces that defend us. In the same Q&A Rusbridger also said this:

Would The Guardian have been willing to hand copy to authorities if there hadn’t been threat of prior restraint?

Answer:

Alan Rusbridger: We had not yet decided what eventually to do with the original material at the point the Government asked us to return it or destroy it.

Theresa May and the Home Office should help Mr. Rusbridger to make up his mind. ‘Destroying’ it is not an option now the Guardian has distributed and trafficked it. Instead, Rusbridger and Gibson, who have access to it, must share that access with our security forces. As the Indie has told us clearly, national security is at stake.

74 comments

  1. nike bot 2014 · July 7, 2014

    Why viewers still make use of to read news papers
    when in this technological world everything is
    presented on web?

  2. gt racing 2 hack · August 13, 2014

    Can I simply just say what a comfort to find an individual who
    genuinely understands what they’re talking
    about over the internet. You definitely realize
    how to bring an issue to light and make it
    important. More people must check this out and understand this side
    of the story. I can’t believe you are not more popular because you most certainly possess
    the gift.

  3. Las Vegas GE Appliance Repairman · September 5, 2014

    Superb, what a webpage it is! This blog gives helpful facts to
    us, keep it up.

  4. free traffic · September 8, 2014

    It’s the best time to make some plans for the long run and it is
    time to be happy. I’ve learn this publish and if I could I want
    to suggest you few attention-grabbing things or advice.
    Perhaps you could write next articles regarding this article.
    I wish to read even more issues about it!

  5. ira contribution limits · September 14, 2014

    Nice blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What web
    host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to
    your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as
    yours lol

  6. linking google plus and facebook · September 20, 2014

    Quality articles is the main to attract the people to pay a quick visit the site, that’s what this web page is providing.

  7. http://Dft.ba/ · September 24, 2014

    Fantastic website you have here but I was wondering if you
    knew of any community forums that cover the same topics talked about in this article?
    I’d really love to be a part of online community where I can get comments from
    other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest.

    If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
    Thanks a lot!

  8. sell house fast companies · September 25, 2014

    I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but great topic.
    I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.
    Thanks for wonderful info I was looking for this information for my
    mission.

  9. www.coquines.sx · September 26, 2014

    Ј’ai trօuvé ton site web par chance et puis je ne le гegrette pas ɗu tout
    !

  10. donate vehicle · September 28, 2014

    I’m not sure exactly why but this web site is loading incredibly slow for
    me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a
    issue on my end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  11. Hi there Dear, are you really visiting this website regularly, if so afterward you will without doubt
    get good know-how.

  12. 55 inch led tv · October 4, 2014

    When someone writes an piece of writing he/she maintains the thought of a user in his/her brain that how
    a user can be aware of it. So that’s why this article is outstdanding.
    Thanks!

  13. Even with their mothers or papas having fun. People who intend to make clear determinations he ought to generate
    in order to satisfy the implementation and support for windscreen 16:
    9 format. Unless you believe that playing computer games,
    especially boys, apparently, are candy crush saga hack
    hazardous. So, I am much happier. Epand is an importance to creating checkpoints in games.

  14. หนังxไทย · October 10, 2014

    I have learn several just right stuff here. Definitely worth
    bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how a lot attempt you set to create this kind of fantastic
    informative website.

  15. vidéo sexuelle · October 14, 2014

    Un postе plein de vérité

  16. cochonne blonde · October 15, 2014

    Cet ɑrticle est vraiment plein de cօnseils

  17. blog porno gratuit · December 8, 2014

    Je vais finir de regarder tout ça Ԁemain

  18. chaudasse · February 4, 2015

    Cеѕ articles sont sincèrement plaisɑnts

  19. tlwork2008@live.cn · March 15, 2015

    FromEveryone birth,lots of people assist them numerous. We [should|need to|must|could} thankfulto their sincerety. However the ones People must demonstrate their best thanksgiving are [our parents|our family head}. From the first minute we come in their lives, they wholeheartedly to take care of the family,But never hope anything in return. Therefore, Public must treasure parents’ love and reward their upbringing.
    Wholesale Snapbakcs http://www.baschapeau.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s